modelgeek.com  web 
login   |    register
 _GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For all ground-operating modelling subjects.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
M6 Heavy Tank
CMOT
Staff MemberEditor-in-Chief
ARMORAMA
_VISITCOMMUNITY
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 14, 2006
KitMaker: 10,954 posts
ModelGeek: 237 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 21, 2015 - 12:30 PM UTC
An earlier version of the American prototype heavy tank has been released by Dragon Models and Kevin Brant takes a look in the box.

Link to Item

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
easyco69
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
ModelGeek: 0 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 21, 2015 - 03:58 PM UTC
What a waste of a project that was in real life, they should have crammed a 90mm in there.
Cantstopbuyingkits
_VISITCOMMUNITY
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
ModelGeek: 36 posts
Posted: Monday, June 22, 2015 - 01:55 AM UTC

obg153
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Texas, United States
Joined: April 07, 2009
KitMaker: 1,063 posts
ModelGeek: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, June 22, 2015 - 07:23 AM UTC
The box art is a real hoot... "and here's one of me and the missus just as we're getting ready to drive to her sister's place for Thanksgiving. The kids?? They're already inside."
C_JACQUEMONT
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Loire-Atlantique, France
Joined: October 09, 2004
KitMaker: 2,433 posts
ModelGeek: 2 posts
Posted: Monday, June 22, 2015 - 04:40 PM UTC
Will watch the Dragon USA Online "DDD" deals and buy that one half price when I can. By the way the M6A1 is on sale today for $34.95, but I prefer the look of the M6.

Cheers,

Christophe

PS : I used to have nothing against DS tracks unless I had a set literally desintegrating, and that's not an uncommon problem if you believe various testimonies on the Internet.
spongya
Staff MemberAssociate Editor
MODELGEEK
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Budapest, Hungary
Joined: February 01, 2005
KitMaker: 2,365 posts
ModelGeek: 318 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - 08:54 PM UTC
Is there a chance for a 1/72 scale version by DML? (Or anyone, really.)
Cantstopbuyingkits
_VISITCOMMUNITY
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
ModelGeek: 36 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - 08:59 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Is there a chance for a 1/72 scale version by DML? (Or anyone, really.)


It's possible they'll be resizing it to braille sometime following on from the upcoming M103 in the scale.
Shermanguy
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Ontario, Canada
Joined: January 22, 2004
KitMaker: 23 posts
ModelGeek: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - 09:38 PM UTC
Since it has a new upper hull, did they fix the turret/hull hatch issue?

I assume the tracks are the same as those in the M6A1 kit (i.e. too wide).
Cantstopbuyingkits
_VISITCOMMUNITY
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
ModelGeek: 36 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - 09:48 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Since it has a new upper hull, did they fix the turret/hull hatch issue?


I've not seen any comments of the parts fit of this release so I can't really say, but then Dragon didn't fix a similar mistake in their second M013 kit so I can see them doing the same on the M6 series.
SgtRam
Staff MemberContributing Editor
AEROSCALE
#197
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 06, 2011
KitMaker: 3,971 posts
ModelGeek: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - 09:52 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Since it has a new upper hull, did they fix the turret/hull hatch issue?


I've not seen any comments of the parts fit of this release so I can't really say, but then Dragon didn't fix a similar mistake in their second M013 kit so I can see them doing the same on the M6 series.


I will be doing a build log soon, and can look at this, but I am not aware of the actual issue. Can some one fill me in?

Thanks
Cantstopbuyingkits
_VISITCOMMUNITY
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
ModelGeek: 36 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - 09:57 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Since it has a new upper hull, did they fix the turret/hull hatch issue?


I've not seen any comments of the parts fit of this release so I can't really say, but then Dragon didn't fix a similar mistake in their second M013 kit so I can see them doing the same on the M6 series.


I will be doing a build log soon, and can look at this, but I am not aware of the actual issue. Can some one fill me in?

Thanks


From what I've heard something on the back hull gets in the way of the turret bttom if you try to model the latter facing directly forwards.
Pedro
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Wojewodztwo Pomorskie, Poland
Joined: May 26, 2003
KitMaker: 1,208 posts
ModelGeek: 104 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - 11:18 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Since it has a new upper hull, did they fix the turret/hull hatch issue?


I've not seen any comments of the parts fit of this release so I can't really say, but then Dragon didn't fix a similar mistake in their second M013 kit so I can see them doing the same on the M6 series.


I will be doing a build log soon, and can look at this, but I am not aware of the actual issue. Can some one fill me in?

Thanks


From what I've heard something on the back hull gets in the way of the turret bttom if you try to model the latter facing directly forwards.

Yes, this was on M103, but on M6 the turret overhangs front hull hatches in a way that would prevent opening them in real life.
Biggles2
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
ModelGeek: 26 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 25, 2015 - 01:25 AM UTC
The M10 had a similar problem, and that was real.
Cantstopbuyingkits
_VISITCOMMUNITY
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
ModelGeek: 36 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 25, 2015 - 01:46 AM UTC
I thinking the overhang is a probably a part of the real tanks now, not a bug (same as some other interwar heavies such as the T35) So they probably haven't fixed it.
Jnoonan
_VISITCOMMUNITY
Canada
Joined: December 27, 2014
KitMaker: 4 posts
ModelGeek: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, July 27, 2015 - 05:23 AM UTC

Quoted Text

What a waste of a project that was in real life, they should have crammed a 90mm in there.



They did.

http://i.imgur.com/wSxzvnJ.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/A35FICn.jpg
 _GOTOTOP